State of Maharashtra vs Dattaram Pundlik Gavade — 160/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO140007692023

e-Filing Number

19-12-2023

Filing Number

536/2023

Filing Date

19-Dec-2023

Registration No

160/2023

Registration Date

21-Dec-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad

Judge

1-C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 11-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

80

Police Station

Police Station Chandgad

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Asst.P.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dattaram Pundlik Gavade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Chandgad acquitted the accused, Dattaram Pundlik Gavde, of charges under the Maharashtra Liquor Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) on April 7, 2026. The court found that while police seized alleged contraband liquor from the accused's possession on March 12, 2023, the prosecution failed to prove the seized substance was actually alcohol through required chemical analysis, and critical procedural gaps—including absence of panch (witness) cooperation and lack of proper documentation—created reasonable doubt, necessitating acquittal under the principle of *in dubio pro reo*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  11. 09-Dec-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  13. 17-Nov-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  14. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  15. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  16. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  17. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  18. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  19. 08-May-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  20. 02-May-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  21. 24-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  22. 10-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  23. 12-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  24. 24-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  25. 30-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  26. 07-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  27. 17-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  28. 25-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  29. 24-Jul-2024

    Charge

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  30. 18-May-2024

    Charge

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  31. 16-Mar-2024

    Charge

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  32. 03-Feb-2024

    Charge

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  33. 09-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 19-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 160/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Chandgad acquitted the accused, Dattaram Pundlik Gavde, of charges under the Maharashtra Liquor Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) on April 7, 2026. The court found that while police seized alleged contraband liquor from the accused's possession on March 12, 2023, the prosecution failed to prove the seized substance was actually alcohol through required chemical analysis, and critical procedural gaps—including absence of panch (witness) cooperation and lack of proper documentation—created reasonable doubt, necessitating acquittal under the principle of *in dubio pro reo*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case