Maya Shankar Dalavi Maiden name Maya Raghunath Gawada vs Raghunath Ravalu Patil alias Gawada Advocate - N. N. Gavade — 183/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO140007602025

Issues

Next Hearing

08th July 2026

e-Filing Number

01-10-2025

Filing Number

242/2025

Filing Date

01-10-2025

Registration No

183/2025

Registration Date

03-10-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad

Judge

6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

Acts & Sections

HINDU SUCCESSION ACT Section 6
Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Maya Shankar Dalavi Maiden name Maya Raghunath Gawada

Adv. Sandip S. Patil

Respondent(s)

Raghunath Ravalu Patil alias Gawada Advocate - N. N. Gavade

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

05-05-2026

Issues

21-04-2026

Order on Exh

02-04-2026

Order on Exh

16-03-2026

Depositing Amount

02-03-2026

Depositing Amount

Interim Orders

05-05-2026
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: RCS 183/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction application GRANTED. The court ordered defendants Raghunath Ravalu Patil and others to be temporarily restrained from alienating or transferring disputed agricultural properties (in villages Kitavade and Jelugade, Kolhapur district) to third parties until final judgment. The judge found plaintiff Maya Shankar Dalavi established a prima-facie case of ancestral/joint family property rights, balance of convenience favored her, and irreparable loss would result if the injunction were denied. Though defendants claimed self-acquired property status, the court determined the ownership question requires trial on merits and should not be conclusively decided at this interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 183/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction application GRANTED. The court ordered defendants Raghunath Ravalu Patil and others to be temporarily restrained from alienating or transferring disputed agricultural properties (in villages Kitavade and Jelugade, Kolhapur district) to third parties until final judgment. The judge found plaintiff Maya Shankar Dalavi established a prima-facie case of ancestral/joint family property rights, balance of convenience favored her, and irreparable loss would result if the injunction were denied. Though defendants claimed self-acquired property status, the court determined the ownership question requires trial on merits and should not be conclusively decided at this interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case