Maya Shankar Dalavi Maiden name Maya Raghunath Gawada vs Raghunath Ravalu Patil alias Gawada Advocate - N. N. Gavade — 183/2025
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO140007602025
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
e-Filing Number
01-10-2025
Filing Number
242/2025
Filing Date
01-10-2025
Registration No
183/2025
Registration Date
03-10-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad
Judge
6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maya Shankar Dalavi Maiden name Maya Raghunath Gawada
Adv. Sandip S. Patil
Respondent(s)
Raghunath Ravalu Patil alias Gawada Advocate - N. N. Gavade
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Issues
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Issues |
| 21-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 02-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 16-03-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 02-03-2026 | Depositing Amount |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 183/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction application GRANTED. The court ordered defendants Raghunath Ravalu Patil and others to be temporarily restrained from alienating or transferring disputed agricultural properties (in villages Kitavade and Jelugade, Kolhapur district) to third parties until final judgment. The judge found plaintiff Maya Shankar Dalavi established a prima-facie case of ancestral/joint family property rights, balance of convenience favored her, and irreparable loss would result if the injunction were denied. Though defendants claimed self-acquired property status, the court determined the ownership question requires trial on merits and should not be conclusively decided at this interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 183/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction application GRANTED. The court ordered defendants Raghunath Ravalu Patil and others to be temporarily restrained from alienating or transferring disputed agricultural properties (in villages Kitavade and Jelugade, Kolhapur district) to third parties until final judgment. The judge found plaintiff Maya Shankar Dalavi established a prima-facie case of ancestral/joint family property rights, balance of convenience favored her, and irreparable loss would result if the injunction were denied. Though defendants claimed self-acquired property status, the court determined the ownership question requires trial on merits and should not be conclusively decided at this interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts