Yuvraj Vaijnath Shinde vs Jijasaheb Naykojirao Desai Advocate - Vikas R. Patil — 145/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO140007042023
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-11-2023
Filing Number
225/2023
Filing Date
07-11-2023
Registration No
145/2023
Registration Date
10-11-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad
Judge
6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yuvraj Vaijnath Shinde
Adv. Jitendra Madhukar Mulik
Respondent(s)
Jijasaheb Naykojirao Desai Advocate - Vikas R. Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 11-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 06-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 30-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 145/2023 Yuvraj Vaijnath Shinde sought an ad-interim ex-parte temporary injunction against defendants claiming he is the rightful owner of the suit property (purchased via registered sale deed from Defendant No. 3), but Defendant No. 1 unlawfully executed a gift deed in favor of Defendant No. 2, and defendants falsely recorded their names in revenue records. On 20/11/2023, the court rejected the prayer for ad-interim/ex-parte temporary injunction, finding no urgency or irreparable harm warranting relief without notice to defendants. The court issued a show cause notice to defendants regarding why temporary injunction should not be granted pending final suit decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 145/2023 Yuvraj Vaijnath Shinde sought an ad-interim ex-parte temporary injunction against defendants claiming he is the rightful owner of the suit property (purchased via registered sale deed from Defendant No. 3), but Defendant No. 1 unlawfully executed a gift deed in favor of Defendant No. 2, and defendants falsely recorded their names in revenue records. On 20/11/2023, the court rejected the prayer for ad-interim/ex-parte temporary injunction, finding no urgency or irreparable harm warranting relief without notice to defendants. The court issued a show cause notice to defendants regarding why temporary injunction should not be granted pending final suit decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts