Sampatti Alias Spruha Rohit Jadhav vs Rohit Balasaheb Jadhav Advocate - J. G. Didbag — 33/2024

Case Summary: PWDVA No. 33/2024 Outcome: The application filed by respondents was rejected. The respondents sought to compel the petitioner (Sampatti Alias Spruha Rohit Jadhav) to produce documents of the house where she currently resides, claiming it was necessary to decide her petition for relief under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court held that since the petitioner stated she resides in a house owned by Jagadguru Sadashiv Gorule (not herself), the burden of proof lies on respondents to prove any contrary claim through evidence. Therefore, the court found it improper to demand production of documents and rejected the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.