Sampatti Alias Spruha Rohit Jadhav vs Rohit Balasaheb Jadhav Advocate - J. G. Didbag — 33/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHKO140006562024
e-Filing Number
22-11-2024
Filing Number
446/2024
Filing Date
27-Nov-2024
Registration No
33/2024
Registration Date
28-Nov-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad
Judge
6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sampatti Alias Spruha Rohit Jadhav
Adv. A. S. Kamble
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rohit Balasaheb Jadhav Advocate - J. G. Didbag
-
2.Balasaheb Dadaso Jadhav
-
3.Sujata Balasaheb Jadhav
-
4.Indrajeet Balasaheb Jadhav
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Jun-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
13-May-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
02-May-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
27-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
13-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
06-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
16-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
23-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
02-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
12-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
29-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
08-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: PWDVA No. 33/2024 Outcome: The application filed by respondents was rejected. The respondents sought to compel the petitioner (Sampatti Alias Spruha Rohit Jadhav) to produce documents of the house where she currently resides, claiming it was necessary to decide her petition for relief under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court held that since the petitioner stated she resides in a house owned by Jagadguru Sadashiv Gorule (not herself), the burden of proof lies on respondents to prove any contrary claim through evidence. Therefore, the court found it improper to demand production of documents and rejected the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
10-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
06-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
15-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
25-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
31-Jul-2025
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
28-Jul-2025
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
30-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
09-Jun-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
05-May-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
21-Apr-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
21-Mar-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
15-Mar-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
17-Feb-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
28-Jan-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
26-Dec-2024
Notice_Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
04-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2024
Case Summary: PWDVA No. 33/2024 Outcome: The application filed by respondents was rejected. The respondents sought to compel the petitioner (Sampatti Alias Spruha Rohit Jadhav) to produce documents of the house where she currently resides, claiming it was necessary to decide her petition for relief under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court held that since the petitioner stated she resides in a house owned by Jagadguru Sadashiv Gorule (not herself), the burden of proof lies on respondents to prove any contrary claim through evidence. Therefore, the court found it improper to demand production of documents and rejected the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts