Krishna Janaku Gavade vs Janaba Dhondiba Tejam Advocate - Bharati G. Kamble — 112/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO140005202023

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

17th July 2026

e-Filing Number

10-08-2023

Filing Number

164/2023

Filing Date

11-08-2023

Registration No

112/2023

Registration Date

05-09-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad

Judge

1-C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order 7

Petitioner(s)

Krishna Janaku Gavade

Adv. A. P. Devan

Respondent(s)

Janaba Dhondiba Tejam Advocate - Bharati G. Kamble

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

04-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

21-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

26-11-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

03-05-2024
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 112/2023 Krishna Janaku Gavade v. Janaba Dhondiba Tejam Advocate & Bharati G. Kamble The court allowed the application filed by respondents (Defendants 2, 3, 5, and 7) to file their written statement, despite a 28-day delay. While the delay was found to be substantial, the court upheld the principle of natural justice and right to defense as paramount. The respondents were ordered to pay costs of ₹200 to the petitioner and file their written statement on record, with the auto-generated previous order being set aside accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 112/2023 Krishna Janaku Gavade v. Janaba Dhondiba Tejam Advocate & Bharati G. Kamble The court allowed the application filed by respondents (Defendants 2, 3, 5, and 7) to file their written statement, despite a 28-day delay. While the delay was found to be substantial, the court upheld the principle of natural justice and right to defense as paramount. The respondents were ordered to pay costs of ₹200 to the petitioner and file their written statement on record, with the auto-generated previous order being set aside accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case