Krishna Janaku Gavade vs Janaba Dhondiba Tejam Advocate - Bharati G. Kamble — 112/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 17-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO140005202023

e-Filing Number

10-08-2023

Filing Number

164/2023

Filing Date

11-Aug-2023

Registration No

112/2023

Registration Date

05-Sep-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad

Judge

1-C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Krishna Janaku Gavade

    Adv. A. P. Devan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Janaba Dhondiba Tejam Advocate - Bharati G. Kamble

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  6. 26-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  7. 17-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  9. 09-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  10. 23-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  11. 07-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  12. 27-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  13. 18-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  14. 07-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  15. 13-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  16. 14-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  17. 11-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  18. 03-May-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 112/2023 Krishna Janaku Gavade v. Janaba Dhondiba Tejam Advocate & Bharati G. Kamble The court allowed the application filed by respondents (Defendants 2, 3, 5, and 7) to file their written statement, despite a 28-day delay. While the delay was found to be substantial, the court upheld the principle of natural justice and right to defense as paramount. The respondents were ordered to pay costs of ₹200 to the petitioner and file their written statement on record, with the auto-generated previous order being set aside accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 03-May-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  20. 25-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  21. 22-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  22. 02-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  23. 20-Dec-2023

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  24. 28-Nov-2023

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  25. 31-Oct-2023

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  26. 06-Oct-2023

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  27. 07-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 11-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 112/2023 Krishna Janaku Gavade v. Janaba Dhondiba Tejam Advocate & Bharati G. Kamble The court allowed the application filed by respondents (Defendants 2, 3, 5, and 7) to file their written statement, despite a 28-day delay. While the delay was found to be substantial, the court upheld the principle of natural justice and right to defense as paramount. The respondents were ordered to pay costs of ₹200 to the petitioner and file their written statement on record, with the auto-generated previous order being set aside accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case