Krishna Janaku Gavade vs Janaba Dhondiba Tejam Advocate - Bharati G. Kamble — 112/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO140005202023
Next Hearing
17th July 2026
e-Filing Number
10-08-2023
Filing Number
164/2023
Filing Date
11-08-2023
Registration No
112/2023
Registration Date
05-09-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad
Judge
1-C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krishna Janaku Gavade
Adv. A. P. Devan
Respondent(s)
Janaba Dhondiba Tejam Advocate - Bharati G. Kamble
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 21-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 26-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 112/2023 Krishna Janaku Gavade v. Janaba Dhondiba Tejam Advocate & Bharati G. Kamble The court allowed the application filed by respondents (Defendants 2, 3, 5, and 7) to file their written statement, despite a 28-day delay. While the delay was found to be substantial, the court upheld the principle of natural justice and right to defense as paramount. The respondents were ordered to pay costs of ₹200 to the petitioner and file their written statement on record, with the auto-generated previous order being set aside accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 112/2023 Krishna Janaku Gavade v. Janaba Dhondiba Tejam Advocate & Bharati G. Kamble The court allowed the application filed by respondents (Defendants 2, 3, 5, and 7) to file their written statement, despite a 28-day delay. While the delay was found to be substantial, the court upheld the principle of natural justice and right to defense as paramount. The respondents were ordered to pay costs of ₹200 to the petitioner and file their written statement on record, with the auto-generated previous order being set aside accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts