Irappa Siddhapa Nitturkar vs Mayanna Krushna Nitturkar Advocate - V. R. Patil — 105/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,39,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO140004952023
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
e-Filing Number
03-08-2023
Filing Number
158/2023
Filing Date
03-08-2023
Registration No
105/2023
Registration Date
05-09-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad
Judge
6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Irappa Siddhapa Nitturkar
Adv. N. N. Gavade
Jakappa Siddhapa Nitturkar
Adv. Namdev Gavade
Pandurang Siddhappa Nitturkar
Adv. Namdev Gavade
Nilkanth Ganu Nitturkar
Adv. Namdev Gavade
Narayan Satuppa Nitturkar
Adv. Namdev Gavade
Parashram Satuppa Nitturkar
Adv. Namdev Gavade
Maruti Satuppa Nitturkar
Adv. Namdev Gavade
Ramchandra Satuppa Nitturkar
Adv. Namdev Gavade
Respondent(s)
Mayanna Krushna Nitturkar Advocate - V. R. Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Issues
Ex-Parte Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
Additional W.S.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Issues |
| 02-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 21-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-11-2025 | Order on Exh |
| 03-11-2025 | Additional W.S. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Niyamit Diwani Dava No. 105/2023 - Irappa Siddappa Niturkur v. Mayamma Krishna Niturkur (Kolhapur District Court, dated 02.01.2026) Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction (taat-purata nai hukum) is GRANTED. The court restrained the defendant from making unauthorized encroachments on the plaintiff's agricultural property and ordered that no further construction be permitted on the disputed land until final judgment in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Niyamit Diwani Dava No. 105/2023 - Irappa Siddappa Niturkur v. Mayamma Krishna Niturkur (Kolhapur District Court, dated 02.01.2026) Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction (taat-purata nai hukum) is GRANTED. The court restrained the defendant from making unauthorized encroachments on the plaintiff's agricultural property and ordered that no further construction be permitted on the disputed land until final judgment in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts