Shankar Shivaji Kamble vs Nobody — 23/2025

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO140002972025

e-Filing Number

23-04-2025

Filing Number

111/2025

Filing Date

23-Apr-2025

Registration No

23/2025

Registration Date

03-May-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad

Judge

6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shankar Shivaji Kamble

    Adv. Sandip S. Patil

  2. 2.Vishnu Shivaji Kamble

    Adv. Sandeep Patil

  3. 3.Maruti Shivaji Kamble

    Adv. Sandeep Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nobody

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application to reopen evidence for the limited purpose of marking exhibit numbers to documents already on record that were inadvertently not exhibited during witness examination. The court reasoned that since the documents were already filed, no prejudice would be caused to the plaintiff who would retain cross-examination rights, and the case's long pendency awaiting a tenancy court report justified allowing this procedural correction in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Order

    Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  9. 17-Nov-2025

    Proclomation

    Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Proclomation

    Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  11. 04-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  12. 08-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  13. 07-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 23-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application to reopen evidence for the limited purpose of marking exhibit numbers to documents already on record that were inadvertently not exhibited during witness examination. The court reasoned that since the documents were already filed, no prejudice would be caused to the plaintiff who would retain cross-examination rights, and the case's long pendency awaiting a tenancy court report justified allowing this procedural correction in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case