Shankar Shivaji Kamble vs Nobody — 23/2025

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 10th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO140002972025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

23-04-2025

Filing Number

111/2025

Filing Date

23-04-2025

Registration No

23/2025

Registration Date

03-05-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad

Judge

6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 372

Petitioner(s)

Shankar Shivaji Kamble

Adv. Sandip S. Patil

Vishnu Shivaji Kamble

Adv. Sandeep Patil

Maruti Shivaji Kamble

Adv. Sandeep Patil

Respondent(s)

Nobody

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

10-03-2026

Disposed

23-02-2026

Order

05-02-2026

Evidence

02-02-2026

Evidence

13-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application to reopen evidence for the limited purpose of marking exhibit numbers to documents already on record that were inadvertently not exhibited during witness examination. The court reasoned that since the documents were already filed, no prejudice would be caused to the plaintiff who would retain cross-examination rights, and the case's long pendency awaiting a tenancy court report justified allowing this procedural correction in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application to reopen evidence for the limited purpose of marking exhibit numbers to documents already on record that were inadvertently not exhibited during witness examination. The court reasoned that since the documents were already filed, no prejudice would be caused to the plaintiff who would retain cross-examination rights, and the case's long pendency awaiting a tenancy court report justified allowing this procedural correction in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case