Sarita Rukmanna Naik vs Sarita Aappa Taral Advocate - V. B. Kadukar — 67/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Lok-Nyayalaya. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO140002782025
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
e-Filing Number
19-04-2025
Filing Number
105/2025
Filing Date
19-04-2025
Registration No
67/2025
Registration Date
19-04-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad
Judge
6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sarita Rukmanna Naik
Adv. Bharati G. Kamble
Respondent(s)
Sarita Aappa Taral Advocate - V. B. Kadukar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Lok-Nyayalaya
Lok-Nyayalaya
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 06-05-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 27-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 67/2025 - Sarita Rukmanna Naik v. Sarita Aappa Taral The court granted an ad interim ex-parte injunction restraining the defendant from carrying out construction on disputed property (15-foot open space adjacent to plaintiff's house) until the defendant's appearance or further court order. The plaintiff established prima facie ownership via village records and documented that illegal construction/digging was damaging her property. The court found irreparable loss would result if construction continued and that delaying the injunction would defeat its purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 67/2025 - Sarita Rukmanna Naik v. Sarita Aappa Taral The court granted an ad interim ex-parte injunction restraining the defendant from carrying out construction on disputed property (15-foot open space adjacent to plaintiff's house) until the defendant's appearance or further court order. The plaintiff established prima facie ownership via village records and documented that illegal construction/digging was damaging her property. The court found irreparable loss would result if construction continued and that delaying the injunction would defeat its purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts