Tukaram Gundu Gavade vs Arun Dhaklu Kengare Advocate - K. S. Surutkar — 69/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39. Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO140002612025
e-Filing Number
15-04-2025
Filing Number
98/2025
Filing Date
16-Apr-2025
Registration No
69/2025
Registration Date
24-Apr-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad
Judge
6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Tukaram Gundu Gavade
Adv. anant kamble
-
2.Aapaji Dhaklu Gavada
Adv. anant kamble
-
3.Vaiju Ningappa Gavada
Adv. anant kamble
-
4.Maruti Balu Chigare
Adv. anant kamble
-
5.Yamaji Satuppa Gavade
Adv. anant kamble
-
6.Bharmanna Satuppa Gavade
Adv. anant kamble
-
7.Laxmi Maruti Gavada
Adv. anant kamble
-
8.Gundu Maruti Gavada
Adv. anant kamble
-
9.Raghunath Maruti Gavada
Adv. anant kamble
-
10.Jotiba Ningappa Gavade
Adv. anant kamble
Respondent(s)
-
1.Arun Dhaklu Kengare Advocate - K. S. Surutkar
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-Mar-2026
Depositing Amount
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
13-Mar-2026
Depositing Amount
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
11-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 69/2025 Summary The court allowed the petitioners' application to set aside the written reply order against respondents 1-4 and permitted them to file a written reply. The court found that respondents deliberately delayed filing their written reply beyond the statutory period despite proper notice, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court imposed costs of ₹500 on the respondents and directed them to submit the written reply, allowing the matter to proceed to merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2026
Depositing Amount
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
13-Dec-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
03-Dec-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
12-Nov-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
16-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
29-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
10-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
13-Aug-2025
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
10-Jul-2025
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
24-Jun-2025
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
09-Jun-2025
Notice_Unready
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
28-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 69/2025
Case 69/2025 Summary The court allowed the petitioners' application to set aside the written reply order against respondents 1-4 and permitted them to file a written reply. The court found that respondents deliberately delayed filing their written reply beyond the statutory period despite proper notice, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court imposed costs of ₹500 on the respondents and directed them to submit the written reply, allowing the matter to proceed to merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts