Tukaram Gundu Gavade vs Arun Dhaklu Kengare Advocate - K. S. Surutkar — 69/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39. Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO140002612025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
15-04-2025
Filing Number
98/2025
Filing Date
16-04-2025
Registration No
69/2025
Registration Date
24-04-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad
Judge
6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tukaram Gundu Gavade
Adv. anant kamble
Aapaji Dhaklu Gavada
Adv. anant kamble
Vaiju Ningappa Gavada
Adv. anant kamble
Maruti Balu Chigare
Adv. anant kamble
Yamaji Satuppa Gavade
Adv. anant kamble
Bharmanna Satuppa Gavade
Adv. anant kamble
Laxmi Maruti Gavada
Adv. anant kamble
Gundu Maruti Gavada
Adv. anant kamble
Raghunath Maruti Gavada
Adv. anant kamble
Jotiba Ningappa Gavade
Adv. anant kamble
Respondent(s)
Arun Dhaklu Kengare Advocate - K. S. Surutkar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 13-03-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 11-02-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 13-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 03-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case 69/2025 Summary The court allowed the petitioners' application to set aside the written reply order against respondents 1-4 and permitted them to file a written reply. The court found that respondents deliberately delayed filing their written reply beyond the statutory period despite proper notice, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court imposed costs of ₹500 on the respondents and directed them to submit the written reply, allowing the matter to proceed to merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 69/2025 Summary The court allowed the petitioners' application to set aside the written reply order against respondents 1-4 and permitted them to file a written reply. The court found that respondents deliberately delayed filing their written reply beyond the statutory period despite proper notice, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court imposed costs of ₹500 on the respondents and directed them to submit the written reply, allowing the matter to proceed to merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts