Apurva Lakshmikant Tupare vs Maharashtra Government In Behalf Of Special Public Prosecutor Advocate - Asst.P.P — 21/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO140001842026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

113/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

21/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad

Judge

6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Apurva Lakshmikant Tupare

    Adv. AMRUT RAMKRISHNA GAWADE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra Government In Behalf Of Special Public Prosecutor Advocate - Asst.P.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court rejected the accused's bail petition filed under CrPC. The court found that the accused had committed fraud through a Cyber Crime Portal with a transaction of ₹40,280, and directed the accused to deposit ₹50,000 as an indemnity bond with a ₹500 bond, while ordering the case to proceed further for investigation by the concerned bank authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the accused's bail petition filed under CrPC. The court found that the accused had committed fraud through a Cyber Crime Portal with a transaction of ₹40,280, and directed the accused to deposit ₹50,000 as an indemnity bond with a ₹500 bond, while ordering the case to proceed further for investigation by the concerned bank authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case