State of Maharashtra vs Narayan Krushna Patil Advocate - V. B. Kadukar — 6/2019
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65F. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO140000402019
Filing Number
29/2019
Filing Date
21-Jan-2019
Registration No
6/2019
Registration Date
21-Jan-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad
Judge
6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
224
Police Station
Police Station Chandgad
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. Asst.P.P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Narayan Krushna Patil Advocate - V. B. Kadukar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Copy of Judgment
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Narayan Krushna Patil (Case 6/2019) Court Decision: The accused, Narayan Krushna Patil, was acquitted of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(F), and discharged under CrPC Section 255(1). The court found the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While police recovered 360 bottles of illicit liquor (Golden Ice Whiskey) from the accused's possession on 24 December 2018, critical evidentiary gaps undermined the prosecution. The FIR complainant could not identify the exact field location, and the prosecution failed to adequately establish the chain of custody for chemical analysis samples, the integrity of seals on sample bottles, or proper preservation procedures—requirements essential for proving illicit alcohol possession under this strict liability statute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Disposed
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
22-Apr-2026
Arguments
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
06-Apr-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
21-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
22-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
18-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
19-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
23-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
21-Jun-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
04-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
09-Feb-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
14-Dec-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
20-Nov-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
03-Oct-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
07-Aug-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
03-Jul-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
11-May-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
17-Mar-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
04-Feb-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
16-Dec-2022
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
04-Nov-2022
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
08-Sep-2022
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
19-Jul-2022
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
10-Jun-2022
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
06-May-2022
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
25-Mar-2022
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
08-Mar-2022
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
18-Jan-2022
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
17-Nov-2021
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
14-Sep-2021
Plea / Particulars
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
12-Jul-2021
Plea / Particulars
Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
-
02-Jun-2021
Plea / Particulars
-
17-Apr-2021
Plea / Particulars
-
08-Feb-2021
Plea / Particulars
-
01-Dec-2020
Plea / Particulars
-
14-Oct-2020
Plea / Particulars
-
15-Jul-2020
Plea / Particulars
-
16-May-2020
Plea / Particulars
-
24-Apr-2020
Plea / Particulars
-
23-Mar-2020
Plea / Particulars
-
20-Jan-2020
Plea / Particulars
-
21-Nov-2019
Plea / Particulars
-
27-Sep-2019
Plea / Particulars
-
13-Aug-2019
Plea / Particulars
-
19-Jun-2019
Plea / Particulars
-
07-May-2019
Plea / Particulars
-
06-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2019
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Narayan Krushna Patil (Case 6/2019) Court Decision: The accused, Narayan Krushna Patil, was acquitted of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(F), and discharged under CrPC Section 255(1). The court found the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While police recovered 360 bottles of illicit liquor (Golden Ice Whiskey) from the accused's possession on 24 December 2018, critical evidentiary gaps undermined the prosecution. The FIR complainant could not identify the exact field location, and the prosecution failed to adequately establish the chain of custody for chemical analysis samples, the integrity of seals on sample bottles, or proper preservation procedures—requirements essential for proving illicit alcohol possession under this strict liability statute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts