Shivajii Parsu Desai vs Yashwant Parsu Desai — 3/2024
Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 34and38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO140000032024
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
e-Filing Number
01-01-2024
Filing Number
2/2024
Filing Date
02-01-2024
Registration No
3/2024
Registration Date
12-01-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Chandgad
Judge
6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivajii Parsu Desai
Adv. V. B. Kadukar
Respondent(s)
Yashwant Parsu Desai
Avalabai Gopal Rajput
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. C.J.J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chandgad
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Issues |
| 06-01-2026 | Issues |
| 28-10-2025 | Issues |
| 11-08-2025 | Issues |
| 31-07-2025 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court partly allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction in a partition suit involving ancestral agricultural properties. While rejecting the restraint on obstruction to joint possession (as the plaintiff's name does not appear in revenue records), the court granted an injunction restraining the defendants from alienating, transferring, or creating third-party interests in the suit property until final judgment, to preserve the subject matter and prevent further complications in the partition proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court partly allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction in a partition suit involving ancestral agricultural properties. While rejecting the restraint on obstruction to joint possession (as the plaintiff's name does not appear in revenue records), the court granted an injunction restraining the defendants from alienating, transferring, or creating third-party interests in the suit property until final judgment, to preserve the subject matter and prevent further complications in the partition proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts