Surekha Balaso Valave etc.01 vs Bhikaji Bala More etc.03 Advocate - A. P. Patil — 170/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO130021902025

e-Filing Number

28-11-2025

Filing Number

291/2025

Filing Date

29-Nov-2025

Registration No

170/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Surekha Balaso Valave etc.01

    Adv. A. J. Desai

  2. 2.Anandi Shankar Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhikaji Bala More etc.03 Advocate - A. P. Patil

  2. 2.Sandhya Shivaji More

  3. 3.Aruna Prakash Patil

  4. 4.Dipali Kushappa Patil

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 170/2025 Surekha Balaso Valave etc. vs. Bhikaji Bala More etc. The court partly allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction in this ancestral property dispute. The plaintiffs (daughters of deceased Shivaji) challenged a gift deed dated 20/03/2021 whereby defendant No. 1 (their father Bhikaji) gifted agricultural land to defendant No. 2 (their niece). The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case as coparceners under the Hindu Succession Act with rights in ancestral property, and that restraining defendant No. 2 from further alienating the property was necessary to prevent irreparable loss. However, the court rejected the plaintiffs' plea to restrain possession interference, finding no documentary evidence of their joint possession since both are married and residing elsewhere. Defendant No. 2 is now enjoined from alienating or creating third-party interests in the suit property until final disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  10. 09-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  11. 09-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 29-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 170/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 170/2025 Surekha Balaso Valave etc. vs. Bhikaji Bala More etc. The court partly allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction in this ancestral property dispute. The plaintiffs (daughters of deceased Shivaji) challenged a gift deed dated 20/03/2021 whereby defendant No. 1 (their father Bhikaji) gifted agricultural land to defendant No. 2 (their niece). The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case as coparceners under the Hindu Succession Act with rights in ancestral property, and that restraining defendant No. 2 from further alienating the property was necessary to prevent irreparable loss. However, the court rejected the plaintiffs' plea to restrain possession interference, finding no documentary evidence of their joint possession since both are married and residing elsewhere. Defendant No. 2 is now enjoined from alienating or creating third-party interests in the suit property until final disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case