Malutai Jaysing Patil etc.01 vs Uday Jaysing Patil etc.04 Advocate - N. J. Shinde — 3/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO130019602025
e-Filing Number
26-09-2025
Filing Number
248/2025
Filing Date
26-09-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
03-10-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Malutai Jaysing Patil etc.01
Adv. S.Y. Kulkarni
Mangal Jaysing Patil
Respondent(s)
Uday Jaysing Patil etc.04 Advocate - N. J. Shinde
Aannaso Jaysing Patil
Savita Yuvraj Patil
Sakharam Vishnu Patil
Pandurang Vishnu Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Disposed
Citation
Steps
Awaiting Notice
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Citation | |
| 24-02-2026 | Steps | |
| 17-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 03-02-2026 | Written Statement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court dismissed the applicant's petition seeking correction of a typographical error (Gat No. 543 vs. 563) in an already-disposed partition suit (RCS 180/2016). The court held that under Section 151 CPC, inherent powers can correct the court's own errors but not party mistakes, and cannot be used to amend pleadings post-disposal. The applicant was granted liberty to pursue appropriate remedies before the competent court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court dismissed the applicant's petition seeking correction of a typographical error (Gat No. 543 vs. 563) in an already-disposed partition suit (RCS 180/2016). The court held that under Section 151 CPC, inherent powers can correct the court's own errors but not party mistakes, and cannot be used to amend pleadings post-disposal. The applicant was granted liberty to pursue appropriate remedies before the competent court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts