Shri. Yashwant Dattajirav Ghatage vs Shri. Raju Dattatray Patil — 199/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,9. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130016532022
Filing Number
338/2022
Filing Date
28-Dec-2022
Registration No
199/2022
Registration Date
30-Dec-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri. Yashwant Dattajirav Ghatage
Adv. O. S. Diwan
-
2.Shri. Satish Murlidhar Shinde
-
3.Shri. Sanjay Marutirav Pawar
-
4.Shri. Ramesh Shivram Patil
-
5.Shri. Vijay Shankar Chavan
-
6.Shri. Maruti Siddharam Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shri. Raju Dattatray Patil
-
2.Shri. Mahadev Dattatray Patil
-
3.Shri. Eknath Siddhu Patil
-
4.Shri. Shivaji Balu Patil
-
5.Shri. Shankar Balu Patil
-
6.Shri. Rangrav Balu Patil
-
7.Shri. Narayan Bapu Patil
-
8.Shri. Keraba Bapu Patil
-
9.Shri. Balu Bapu Patil
-
10.Shri. Chandar Bapu Patil
-
11.Shri. Hindurav Bapu Patil
-
12.Balu Ishwara Patil
-
13.Shri. Chandar Ishwara Patil
-
14.Shri. Kisan Ishwara Patil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 199/2022 The National Lok Adalat (before the Civil Judge Junior Division, Kagal) disposed of the dispute between petitioners Yashwant Dattajirav Ghatage, Satish Murlidhar Shinde, and Sanjay Marutirav Pawar against respondents Raju Dattatray Patil, Mahadev Dattatray Patil, and Eknath Siddhu Patil through a settlement reached by compromise between the parties. The court ordered that the suit be disposed as compromised, any interim relief stands vacated, and court fees be refunded as per rules (dated 14/03/2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
27-Feb-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
09-Feb-2026
Compromise
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
13-Dec-2025
Compromise
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
27-Nov-2025
Compromise
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence
-
17-Dec-2024
Issues
-
05-Nov-2024
Issues
-
17-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
23-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
19-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
05-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
08-May-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
26-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
15-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
08-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
10-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
22-Nov-2023
Awaiting Notice
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
29-Sep-2023
Awaiting Notice
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
06-Sep-2023
Awaiting Notice
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
24-Aug-2023
Awaiting Notice
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
31-Jul-2023
Notice Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
28-Jul-2023
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
14-Jun-2023
Order on T.I.View PDF
-
14-Jun-2023
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
02-May-2023
Order on Exh
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
20-Apr-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
06-Apr-2023
Issues
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
16-Mar-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
20-Feb-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
03-Feb-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
04-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 199/2022
Case Summary: 199/2022 The National Lok Adalat (before the Civil Judge Junior Division, Kagal) disposed of the dispute between petitioners Yashwant Dattajirav Ghatage, Satish Murlidhar Shinde, and Sanjay Marutirav Pawar against respondents Raju Dattatray Patil, Mahadev Dattatray Patil, and Eknath Siddhu Patil through a settlement reached by compromise between the parties. The court ordered that the suit be disposed as compromised, any interim relief stands vacated, and court fees be refunded as per rules (dated 14/03/2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts