State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station vs Abhijit Namdev Kamate etc. — 627/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO130013682023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-10-2023

Filing Number

1105/2023

Filing Date

27-10-2023

Registration No

627/2023

Registration Date

27-10-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal

Judge

10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

231

Police Station

Police Station Murgud

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

Abhijit Namdev Kamate etc.

Shankar Ishwara Gosavi

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2

24-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

10-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

06-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

25-02-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted both accused persons (Abhijit Namdeo Kamte and Shankar Ishwara Gosavi) of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12-A, finding that the prosecution failed to sufficiently prove the gambling offense beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including lack of credible eyewitness testimony, inadequate documentation of seized materials, and failure to establish the accused's involvement in conducting gambling operations. The seized cash of Rs. 2,130 is to be deposited with the government, and the seized gambling materials are to be destroyed after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted both accused persons (Abhijit Namdeo Kamte and Shankar Ishwara Gosavi) of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12-A, finding that the prosecution failed to sufficiently prove the gambling offense beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including lack of credible eyewitness testimony, inadequate documentation of seized materials, and failure to establish the accused's involvement in conducting gambling operations. The seized cash of Rs. 2,130 is to be deposited with the government, and the seized gambling materials are to be destroyed after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case