State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station vs Abhijit Namdev Kamate etc. — 627/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO130013682023
e-Filing Number
27-10-2023
Filing Number
1105/2023
Filing Date
27-10-2023
Registration No
627/2023
Registration Date
27-10-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
231
Police Station
Police Station Murgud
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Abhijit Namdev Kamate etc.
Shankar Ishwara Gosavi
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 10-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 06-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 25-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted both accused persons (Abhijit Namdeo Kamte and Shankar Ishwara Gosavi) of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12-A, finding that the prosecution failed to sufficiently prove the gambling offense beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including lack of credible eyewitness testimony, inadequate documentation of seized materials, and failure to establish the accused's involvement in conducting gambling operations. The seized cash of Rs. 2,130 is to be deposited with the government, and the seized gambling materials are to be destroyed after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted both accused persons (Abhijit Namdeo Kamte and Shankar Ishwara Gosavi) of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12-A, finding that the prosecution failed to sufficiently prove the gambling offense beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including lack of credible eyewitness testimony, inadequate documentation of seized materials, and failure to establish the accused's involvement in conducting gambling operations. The seized cash of Rs. 2,130 is to be deposited with the government, and the seized gambling materials are to be destroyed after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts