State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station vs Sanjay Maruti Kamble etc.06 Advocate - S. S. Patil — 626/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO130013672023
e-Filing Number
27-10-2023
Filing Number
1104/2023
Filing Date
27-10-2023
Registration No
626/2023
Registration Date
27-10-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
228
Police Station
Police Station Murgud
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Maruti Kamble etc.06 Advocate - S. S. Patil
Ananda Sadashiv Adasul
Prakash Bhauso Sutar
Sunil Dadu Mane
Tanaji Yashwant Patil
Bajirao Sadashiv Patil
Shivaji Yashwant Chitale
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all seven defendants of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12-A, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the gambling offense beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment noted critical evidentiary gaps, including the lack of eyewitness testimony, improper seizure procedures, and the investigating officer's admission of not conducting proper ground investigation at the raid site on September 3, 2023. The court ordered the confiscated cash (₹7,330) to be deposited with the government, gambling materials to be destroyed, and three mobile phones to be sold publicly after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all seven defendants of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12-A, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the gambling offense beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment noted critical evidentiary gaps, including the lack of eyewitness testimony, improper seizure procedures, and the investigating officer's admission of not conducting proper ground investigation at the raid site on September 3, 2023. The court ordered the confiscated cash (₹7,330) to be deposited with the government, gambling materials to be destroyed, and three mobile phones to be sold publicly after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts