Akkatai Babaso Patil vs Raghunath Rama Patade — 157/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130013112022
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
247/2022
Filing Date
17-09-2022
Registration No
157/2022
Registration Date
01-10-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Akkatai Babaso Patil
Adv. A. J. Desai
Respondent(s)
Raghunath Rama Patade
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 19-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The interim application filed by the defendants under CPC Order 39, Rules 1-2 seeking to restrain the plaintiff from creating third-party interests over the suit property and directing deposit of sugarcane bills was rejected. The court found the defendants failed to establish a prima-facie case, as their pleadings were vague and ambiguous regarding which specific area and which year's sugarcane income was to be deposited, and they provided no documentary evidence showing the plaintiff was in any hurry to alienate the property. No order as to costs was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The interim application filed by the defendants under CPC Order 39, Rules 1-2 seeking to restrain the plaintiff from creating third-party interests over the suit property and directing deposit of sugarcane bills was rejected. The court found the defendants failed to establish a prima-facie case, as their pleadings were vague and ambiguous regarding which specific area and which year's sugarcane income was to be deposited, and they provided no documentary evidence showing the plaintiff was in any hurry to alienate the property. No order as to costs was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts