Tukaram Piru Magdum vs Abhijeet Hari Magdum — 175/2023
Case under Transfer of Property Act Section 60. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130011842023
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-09-2023
Filing Number
329/2023
Filing Date
27-09-2023
Registration No
175/2023
Registration Date
09-10-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tukaram Piru Magdum
Adv. R. R. Sasane
Respondent(s)
Abhijeet Hari Magdum
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 29-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 18-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case 175/2023 Summary: The defendant's application to file a late written statement was allowed. The court condoned the delay and permitted the defendant to file the written statement on record, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 700 to the plaintiff. The court found the delay condonable as the defendant's response was necessary for proper adjudication of the suit for declaration and perpetual injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 175/2023 Summary: The defendant's application to file a late written statement was allowed. The court condoned the delay and permitted the defendant to file the written statement on record, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 700 to the plaintiff. The court found the delay condonable as the defendant's response was necessary for proper adjudication of the suit for declaration and perpetual injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts