State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station vs Chandrakant Baburao Powar — 626/2025
Case under Bombay Police Act Section 102,117. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO130011502025
Filing Number
1049/2025
Filing Date
26-05-2025
Registration No
626/2025
Registration Date
11-06-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
95
Police Station
Police Station Murgud
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Chandrakant Baburao Powar
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Disposed
Admission and Denial
Admission and Denial
Admission and Denial
Admission and Denial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Admission and Denial |
| 13-12-2025 | Admission and Denial |
| 09-12-2025 | Admission and Denial |
| 13-09-2025 | Admission and Denial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 626/2025 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Chandrakant Baburao Powar for parking his vehicle (KA-23-A-5985) on the Murgud-Nipani Highway on 03/04/2025, causing obstruction in a public way, under Sections 102/117 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges and consequences were explained to him. The court, taking a lenient view given the nature of the offence and the accused's cooperation, sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500 with simple imprisonment for one day as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 626/2025 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Chandrakant Baburao Powar for parking his vehicle (KA-23-A-5985) on the Murgud-Nipani Highway on 03/04/2025, causing obstruction in a public way, under Sections 102/117 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after the charges and consequences were explained to him. The court, taking a lenient view given the nature of the offence and the accused's cooperation, sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500 with simple imprisonment for one day as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts