State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station vs Vaishnavi Laxman Naik — 617/2025
Case under Bombay Police Act Section 110,117. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO130011412025
Filing Number
1040/2025
Filing Date
26-May-2025
Registration No
617/2025
Registration Date
11-Jun-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
147
Police Station
Police Station Murgud
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vaishnavi Laxman Naik
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Murgud P.S. v. Vaishnavi Laxman Naik (617/2025) The court convicted accused Vaishnavi Laxman Naik under Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for unruly and disorderly conduct on 23/04/2025, after she voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine with one day simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
09-Mar-2026
Admission and Denial
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
13-Dec-2025
Admission and Denial
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
10-Dec-2025
Admission and Denial
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
13-Sep-2025
Admission and Denial
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
17-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 617/2025
Case Summary: Murgud P.S. v. Vaishnavi Laxman Naik (617/2025) The court convicted accused Vaishnavi Laxman Naik under Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for unruly and disorderly conduct on 23/04/2025, after she voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine with one day simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts