Suchita Dhanaji Godhade etc.02 vs Godabai Rau Bharmal etc. — 143/2023
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 332. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130009672023
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-08-2023
Filing Number
244/2023
Filing Date
17-08-2023
Registration No
143/2023
Registration Date
19-08-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suchita Dhanaji Godhade etc.02
Adv. S S Kestikar
Ambutai Yashwant Kondekar
Adv. S S Kestikar
Mangal Ashok Tippe
Adv. S S Kestikar
Respondent(s)
Godabai Rau Bharmal etc.
Maruti Rau Bharmal
Shobhatai Aananda Shenvi
Sarjerao Ishwara Godhade
Bajirao Ishwara Godhade
Dhanaji Ishwara Godhade
Santaji Ranoji Ishwara Godhade
Mahadev Bhairu Amte
Sadashiv Bhairu Amte
Shankar Bhairu Amte
Sunil Madhukar Mendake
Prasad Bajirao Godhade
Anita Deepak Kardile
Prakash Sarjerao Godhade
Rupali Dattatray Yerudkar
Kirti Kushal Lokhande
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Evidence
Steps
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps |
| 23-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 08-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 18-10-2025 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Case 143/2023 Summary In this partition suit, defendants 15 & 16 sought permission to file their written statement after missing the stipulated deadline. The court allowed their application to condone the delay, finding their written statements necessary for proper adjudication of the partition suit, and granted defendants their right to be heard. The delay was condoned subject to payment of Rs. 500 costs to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 143/2023 Summary In this partition suit, defendants 15 & 16 sought permission to file their written statement after missing the stipulated deadline. The court allowed their application to condone the delay, finding their written statements necessary for proper adjudication of the partition suit, and granted defendants their right to be heard. The delay was condoned subject to payment of Rs. 500 costs to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts