Yashwant Maruti Shikhare vs Gundu Krushna Shikhare Deceased Advocate - S. T. Chavan — 104/2020

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Steps Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO130007942020

Filing Number

163/2020

Filing Date

02-Nov-2020

Registration No

104/2020

Registration Date

02-Nov-2020

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yashwant Maruti Shikhare

    Adv. G. V. Chougale

  2. 2.Tukaram Maruti Shikhare

  3. 3.Shantabai Maruti Shikhare

  4. 4.Anita Namdev Suryvanshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gundu Krushna Shikhare Deceased Advocate - S. T. Chavan

  2. 2.Ratnappa Krushna Shikhare Deceased(Legal Heir)

  3. 3.Uttam Pandurang Jadhav

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Steps

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  5. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  6. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  7. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  8. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  9. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  10. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  11. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  12. 20-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  13. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  14. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  15. 12-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  16. 29-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  17. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  18. 25-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  19. 30-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  20. 16-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  21. 21-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  22. 06-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  23. 12-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  24. 09-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  25. 14-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  26. 11-Oct-2022

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 104/2020 Outcome: Injunction ALLOWED. The court restrained Defendant No. 3 from causing disturbance, obstruction, or interference to the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of the disputed property until disposal of the suit. Key Facts: The dispute concerns ancestral property in Kolhapur. A prior partition judgment (R.C.S. No. 91/2005) allocated shares to three legal heirs but excluded Gundu Shikhare. Defendant No. 3 purchased the property from Gundu's successors via deed in 2020, relying on Gundu's wrongly-entered name in land records. The court found the sale invalid because Gundu had no disposable rights under the unchallenged 2005 judgment, and a revenue appeal (RTS 61/2020) had already canceled the defendant's mutation entry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 11-Oct-2022

    List of Witness

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  28. 26-Sep-2022

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  29. 19-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  30. 05-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  31. 18-Jul-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  32. 21-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  33. 02-May-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  34. 04-Apr-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  35. 14-Feb-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  36. 17-Jan-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  37. 13-Dec-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  38. 18-Nov-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  39. 08-Oct-2021

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  40. 16-Aug-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  41. 07-Jul-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  42. 07-Jun-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  43. 26-Apr-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  44. 05-Apr-2021

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  45. 08-Mar-2021

    Reply/Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  46. 20-Feb-2021

    Reply/Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  47. 01-Feb-2021

    Reply/Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  48. 11-Jan-2021

    Reply/Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  49. 09-Dec-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  50. 21-Nov-2020

    Awaiting Notice

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  51. 11-Nov-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 02-Nov-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 104/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 104/2020 Outcome: Injunction ALLOWED. The court restrained Defendant No. 3 from causing disturbance, obstruction, or interference to the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of the disputed property until disposal of the suit. Key Facts: The dispute concerns ancestral property in Kolhapur. A prior partition judgment (R.C.S. No. 91/2005) allocated shares to three legal heirs but excluded Gundu Shikhare. Defendant No. 3 purchased the property from Gundu's successors via deed in 2020, relying on Gundu's wrongly-entered name in land records. The court found the sale invalid because Gundu had no disposable rights under the unchallenged 2005 judgment, and a revenue appeal (RTS 61/2020) had already canceled the defendant's mutation entry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case