State of Maharashtra Th. Kagal Police Station vs Manjunath Subbu Lamani — 411/2025
Case under Bombay Police Act Section 115,117. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO130006922025
Filing Number
638/2025
Filing Date
03-Apr-2025
Registration No
411/2025
Registration Date
05-Apr-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 11-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
148
Police Station
Police Station Kagal
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Th. Kagal Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manjunath Subbu Lamani
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate at Kagal dismissed criminal proceedings against Manjunath Subbu Lamani under Section 258 of Cr.P.C./281 of BNSS for offences under Sections 115/117 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The court found that the case had been pending for over one year with no progress due to the accused's continuous absence and no likelihood of his appearance, making it futile to continue proceedings in a summary matter. The accused was discharged from the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
21-Feb-2026
Admission and Denial
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
10-Dec-2025
Admission and Denial
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
13-Sep-2025
Admission and Denial
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
09-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 411/2025
The Judicial Magistrate at Kagal dismissed criminal proceedings against Manjunath Subbu Lamani under Section 258 of Cr.P.C./281 of BNSS for offences under Sections 115/117 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The court found that the case had been pending for over one year with no progress due to the accused's continuous absence and no likelihood of his appearance, making it futile to continue proceedings in a summary matter. The accused was discharged from the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts