State of Maharashtra Th. Kagal Police Station vs Chandrashekhar Bhimappa Lamani — 410/2025
Case under Bombay Police Act Section 115,117. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO130006912025
Filing Number
637/2025
Filing Date
03-Apr-2025
Registration No
410/2025
Registration Date
05-Apr-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 11-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
147
Police Station
Police Station Kagal
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Th. Kagal Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chandrashekhar Bhimappa Lamani
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate at Kagal discharged accused Chandrashekhar Bhimappa Lamani by stopping proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC/281 of BNSS due to the case being pending for over one year with no prospect of the accused's appearance. The court found that continuing the summary matter would serve no purpose given the minimal punishment involved and the accused's persistent absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
21-Feb-2026
Admission and Denial
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
10-Dec-2025
Admission and Denial
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
13-Sep-2025
Admission and Denial
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
09-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 410/2025
The Judicial Magistrate at Kagal discharged accused Chandrashekhar Bhimappa Lamani by stopping proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC/281 of BNSS due to the case being pending for over one year with no prospect of the accused's appearance. The court found that continuing the summary matter would serve no purpose given the minimal punishment involved and the accused's persistent absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts