Sadashiv Chanbasappa Swami vs Shripati Tukaram Torase — 103/2023
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 37. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130006862023
Next Hearing
10th July 2026
e-Filing Number
14-06-2023
Filing Number
187/2023
Filing Date
14-06-2023
Registration No
103/2023
Registration Date
16-06-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sadashiv Chanbasappa Swami
Adv. S S Kestikar
Respondent(s)
Shripati Tukaram Torase
Sulochana Shripati Torase
Arvind Shripati Torase
Apurva Arvind Torase
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 08-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 103/2023 Outcome: Temporary injunction application ALLOWED. The court granted the plaintiff's request for temporary restraint against the defendants, restricting them from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit property and from interfering with the completion of roof repairs to his old house until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction, particularly given ongoing monsoon season damage risk to the unroofed house. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 103/2023 Outcome: Temporary injunction application ALLOWED. The court granted the plaintiff's request for temporary restraint against the defendants, restricting them from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit property and from interfering with the completion of roof repairs to his old house until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction, particularly given ongoing monsoon season damage risk to the unroofed house. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts