Jingonda Bandu Chougule etc.04 vs Smt. Anjana Mahavir Chougule etc.06 Advocate - Deepak A. Patil — 120/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,. Status: Amended W.S.. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130005782021
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
186/2021
Filing Date
12-08-2021
Registration No
120/2021
Registration Date
12-08-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jingonda Bandu Chougule etc.04
Adv. P. J. Powar
Ravikumar Shrikant Chougule
Nitin Shashikant Chougule
Smt. Bebitai Chandrakant Chougule
Sukant Jingonda Chougule
Respondent(s)
Smt. Anjana Mahavir Chougule etc.06 Advocate - Deepak A. Patil
Pradip Mahavir Chougule
Adv. D.A.Patil
Sandip Mahavir Chougule
Adv. D.A.Patil
Kuber Surendra Chougule
Adv. D.A.Patil
Sudhir Balgonda Chougule
Adv. D.A.Patil
Shital Balgonda Chougule
Adv. D.A.Patil
Pravin Annaso Kurade
Adv. P.S.Kakade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Amended W.S.
Amended W.S.
Amended W.S.
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Amended W.S. | |
| 07-04-2026 | Amended W.S. | |
| 10-03-2026 | Amended W.S. | |
| 12-02-2026 | Steps | |
| 05-01-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: The Civil Judge Junior Division, Kagal, allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the affidavit filed in a suit for possession, declaration, and perpetual injunction (R.C.S. No. 120/2021). The court found the proposed amendments—correcting "Gat No. 157" to "Gat No. 147" and changing "The defendant has given" to "The defendant did not"—to be clerical in nature causing no prejudice to defendants. The defendants are permitted to file consequential amendments in response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: The Civil Judge Junior Division, Kagal, allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the affidavit filed in a suit for possession, declaration, and perpetual injunction (R.C.S. No. 120/2021). The court found the proposed amendments—correcting "Gat No. 157" to "Gat No. 147" and changing "The defendant has given" to "The defendant did not"—to be clerical in nature causing no prejudice to defendants. The defendants are permitted to file consequential amendments in response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts