State of Maharashtra Th. Kagal Police Station vs Devdas Ahariya — 349/2025

Case under Bombay Police Act Section 115,117. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO130005712025

Filing Number

517/2025

Filing Date

24-Mar-2025

Registration No

349/2025

Registration Date

05-Apr-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 11-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

67

Police Station

Police Station Kagal

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Police Act Section 115,117

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Th. Kagal Police Station

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Devdas Ahariya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate at Kagal discharged the accused Devdas Ahariya by stopping proceedings under Section 258 Cr.P.C./281 BNSS against charges under Sections 115/117 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The court found that after more than one year of pendency with the accused remaining absent and no prospect of his appearance, continuing the summary matter would serve no purpose given the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  4. 09-Dec-2025

    Admission and Denial

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  5. 13-Sep-2025

    Admission and Denial

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  6. 08-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 349/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate at Kagal discharged the accused Devdas Ahariya by stopping proceedings under Section 258 Cr.P.C./281 BNSS against charges under Sections 115/117 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The court found that after more than one year of pendency with the accused remaining absent and no prospect of his appearance, continuing the summary matter would serve no purpose given the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case