Madhukar Nivrutti Kulavmode vs Prakash Dagdu Wadkar and 3 Array[3]- R.B/Patil Def/1 Array[3]- R.B/Patil Def/1R.B.Patil def.1, — 1700117/2015
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,39,34. Status: Summons_Ready. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130005562015
Filing Number
1700117/2015
Filing Date
13-Jul-2015
Registration No
1700117/2015
Registration Date
14-Jul-2015
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Madhukar Nivrutti Kulavmode
Adv. S. S. Kestikar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prakash Dagdu Wadkar and 3 Array[3]- R.B/Patil Def/1 Array[3]- R.B/Patil Def/1R.B.Patil def.1,
-
2.Anita Balwant Kulavmode
-
3.Aruna Balwant Kulavmode
-
4.Suraj Balwant Kulavmode
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Summons_Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
16-Mar-2026
Summons_Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
03-Jan-2026
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
19-Dec-2025
Steps_Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
14-Nov-2025
Order on Exhibit
In case RCS No. 117/2015, the Joint Civil Judge of Kagal ordered the suit to be kept for necessary order of dismissal due to prolonged inactivity spanning over 10 years. The court found that the plaintiff and his advocate had not proceeded with the matter, the defendant's evidence remained pending, and the plaintiff appeared uninterested in conducting the case. The court deemed continued pendency would cause unnecessary judicial burden and serve no purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Nov-2025
Dismissal Order
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
08-Oct-2025
Defence Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
15-Sep-2025
Defence Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
30-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
07-Apr-2025
Hearing
-
27-Feb-2025
Hearing
-
15-Jan-2025
Hearing
-
06-Dec-2024
Hearing
-
18-Oct-2024
Hearing
-
20-Sep-2024
Hearing
-
21-Aug-2024
Hearing
-
11-Jul-2024
Hearing
-
06-May-2024
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
21-Mar-2024
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
16-Feb-2024
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
17-Jan-2024
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
22-Nov-2023
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
05-Oct-2023
Recasting of Issues
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
08-Sep-2023
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
04-Aug-2023
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
07-Jul-2023
Additional Issues
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
07-Jun-2023
Amended Plaint
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
05-Apr-2023
Amended Plaint
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
15-Mar-2023
Order on Exhibit
-
15-Mar-2023
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
04-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
02-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
06-Jan-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
02-Dec-2022
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
03-Nov-2022
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
07-Oct-2022
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
02-Sep-2022
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
10-Aug-2022
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
07-Jul-2022
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
16-Mar-2022
Evidence
-
10-Feb-2022
Evidence
-
07-Jan-2022
Evidence
-
08-Dec-2021
Evidence
-
18-Nov-2021
Evidence
-
13-Oct-2021
Evidence
-
13-Aug-2021
Evidence
-
05-Jul-2021
Evidence
-
22-Apr-2021
Evidence
-
12-Mar-2021
Evidence
-
25-Jan-2021
Evidence
-
09-Dec-2020
Evidence
-
23-Oct-2020
Evidence
-
23-Sep-2020
Evidence
-
12-Aug-2020
Evidence
-
14-Jul-2020
Evidence
-
27-May-2020
Evidence
-
06-May-2020
Evidence
-
17-Apr-2020
Evidence
-
07-Mar-2020
Evidence
-
17-Feb-2020
Evidence
-
17-Jan-2020
Evidence
-
11-Dec-2019
Evidence
-
23-Oct-2019
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
13-Sep-2019
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
05-Aug-2019
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
08-Jul-2019
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
07-Jun-2019
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
26-Mar-2019
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
07-Jan-2019
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
17-Nov-2018
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
14-Sep-2018
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
06-Jul-2018
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
16-Apr-2018
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
01-Mar-2018
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
05-Jan-2018
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
20-Nov-2017
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
26-Sep-2017
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
09-Aug-2017
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
28-Jun-2017
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
22-Mar-2017
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
20-Feb-2017
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
23-Dec-2016
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
15-Oct-2016
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
20-Aug-2016
Order on Exhibit
-
20-Aug-2016
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
08-Aug-2016
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
04-Aug-2016
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
30-Jul-2016
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
29-Jul-2016
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
21-Jul-2016
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
11-Jul-2016
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
22-Jun-2016
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
10-Jun-2016
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
25-Apr-2016
Awaiting Summons
-
19-Mar-2016
Awaiting Summons
-
22-Feb-2016
Awaiting Summons
-
20-Feb-2016
Awaiting Summons
-
01-Feb-2016
Awaiting Summons
-
30-Jan-2016
Awaiting Summons
-
16-Jan-2016
Awaiting Summons
-
17-Dec-2015
Awaiting Summons
-
01-Dec-2015
Awaiting Summons
-
07-Nov-2015
Awaiting Summons
-
30-Oct-2015
Awaiting Summons
-
14-Oct-2015
Awaiting Summons
-
16-Sep-2015
Awaiting Summons
-
07-Sep-2015
Awaiting Summons
-
21-Aug-2015
Awaiting Summons
-
06-Aug-2015
Awaiting Summons
-
14-Jul-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jul-2015
Awaiting Summons
-
13-Jul-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 1700117/2015
In case RCS No. 117/2015, the Joint Civil Judge of Kagal ordered the suit to be kept for necessary order of dismissal due to prolonged inactivity spanning over 10 years. The court found that the plaintiff and his advocate had not proceeded with the matter, the defendant's evidence remained pending, and the plaintiff appeared uninterested in conducting the case. The court deemed continued pendency would cause unnecessary judicial burden and serve no purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts