Udhdav Savaba Patil vs Kalpan Ambaji Patil etc.4 Advocate - K. D. Jadhav — 100/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO130004442021

Filing Number

154/2021

Filing Date

01-Jul-2021

Registration No

100/2021

Registration Date

01-Jul-2021

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Udhdav Savaba Patil

    Adv. G. V. Chougale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalpan Ambaji Patil etc.4 Advocate - K. D. Jadhav

  2. 2.Kavita Ambaji Patil

  3. 3.Sohel Haidarkhan Nadaf

    Adv. K.D.Jadhav,K. D. Jadhav

  4. 4.Ranjit Dinkar Patil

    Adv. K.D.Jadhav,K. D. Jadhav

  5. 5.Satish Shankar Sabale

    Adv. K.D.Jadhav,K. D. Jadhav K. D. Jadhav

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  5. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  7. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  8. 04-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  9. 07-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  10. 21-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  11. 05-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  12. 09-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  13. 07-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  14. 05-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  15. 25-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  16. 06-May-2024

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  17. 14-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  18. 22-Jan-2024

    Additional Issues

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  19. 18-Dec-2023

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  20. 19-Oct-2023

    Reply/Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  21. 08-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  22. 03-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  23. 03-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  24. 15-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  25. 27-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  26. 24-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  27. 23-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  28. 12-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  29. 14-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  30. 26-Sep-2022

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 100/2021 Outcome: Application for interim injunction rejected. Plaintiff Uddhav Patil sought to restrain defendants 4 and 5 from disturbing his peaceful possession of ancestral property (Gat No. 87, Malage Khurd, Kolhapur). The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience favoring the plaintiff, and no irreparable loss, as subsequent sale deeds clarified defendants' prima facie possession of their half share. The court noted the plaintiff failed to file a preemption suit timely and presented no witness affidavits supporting joint possession claims. Accordingly, the injunction application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  31. 26-Sep-2022

    List of Witness

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  32. 12-Sep-2022

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  33. 03-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  34. 30-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  35. 18-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  36. 26-Jul-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  37. 26-Jul-2022

    Steps

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  38. 18-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  39. 29-Apr-2022

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  40. 07-Apr-2022

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  41. 31-Mar-2022

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  42. 17-Mar-2022

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  43. 17-Feb-2022

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  44. 25-Jan-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  45. 11-Jan-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  46. 18-Dec-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  47. 02-Dec-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  48. 16-Nov-2021

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  49. 21-Oct-2021

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  50. 29-Sep-2021

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  51. 09-Sep-2021

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  52. 23-Aug-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  53. 20-Jul-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  54. 09-Jul-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 01-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 100/2021 Outcome: Application for interim injunction rejected. Plaintiff Uddhav Patil sought to restrain defendants 4 and 5 from disturbing his peaceful possession of ancestral property (Gat No. 87, Malage Khurd, Kolhapur). The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience favoring the plaintiff, and no irreparable loss, as subsequent sale deeds clarified defendants' prima facie possession of their half share. The court noted the plaintiff failed to file a preemption suit timely and presented no witness affidavits supporting joint possession claims. Accordingly, the injunction application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case