Sarpanch Grampanchayat, Hanbarwadi vs Pandurang Mallavva Kengar etc. — 60/2024

Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 37. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO130003622024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

09th July 2026

e-Filing Number

01-03-2024

Filing Number

99/2024

Filing Date

01-03-2024

Registration No

60/2024

Registration Date

05-03-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 37

Petitioner(s)

Sarpanch Grampanchayat, Hanbarwadi

Adv. S. S. Kestikar

Respondent(s)

Pandurang Mallavva Kengar etc.

Sonabai Aananda Masole

Parubai Dhondiba Davane

Sarsabai Basappa Davane

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.

23-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

30-03-2026

Steps

16-03-2026

Order on Exh

05-02-2026

Order on Exh

20-12-2025

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

30-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary - RCS 60/2024 The court allowed the defendants' application to amend their Written Statement under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. The defendants sought to add paragraph 12-A regarding the sale of the suit property by original owner Shrimant Kshatra Jagatguru to the defendant's mother, claiming documents were unavailable at the time of filing. Though the plaintiff opposed the amendment as an afterthought, the court permitted it, finding it necessary to decide the real controversy and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. The defendants were directed to file the amended Written Statement within the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - RCS 60/2024 The court allowed the defendants' application to amend their Written Statement under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. The defendants sought to add paragraph 12-A regarding the sale of the suit property by original owner Shrimant Kshatra Jagatguru to the defendant's mother, claiming documents were unavailable at the time of filing. Though the plaintiff opposed the amendment as an afterthought, the court permitted it, finding it necessary to decide the real controversy and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. The defendants were directed to file the amended Written Statement within the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case