Asha Kundlik Patil vs Kundlik Maruti patil Advocate - O.S.Diwan, O. S. Diwan, O. S. DiwanO. S. Diwan, — 42/2020
Case under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act Section 18. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130003212020
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
68/2020
Filing Date
17-03-2020
Registration No
42/2020
Registration Date
17-03-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Asha Kundlik Patil
Adv. A.P.Patil
Respondent(s)
Kundlik Maruti patil Advocate - O.S.Diwan, O. S. Diwan, O. S. DiwanO. S. Diwan,
Maruti Gopal patil
Anandi Maruti pati
Surekha Balasaheb Kaginkar
Asha Swarup Darvatkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 29-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case 42/2020 Summary: The Civil Judge allowed Asha Patil's application to amend the plaint in her maintenance suit under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC. The amendment seeks to add the word "Dead" after Defendant No. 2's name, as he died on 30/01/2023, with his legal representatives already added as parties. The court found the amendment clerical and consequential in nature, causing no prejudice to defendants, and permitted the plaintiff to file the amended plaint within stipulated time with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 42/2020 Summary: The Civil Judge allowed Asha Patil's application to amend the plaint in her maintenance suit under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC. The amendment seeks to add the word "Dead" after Defendant No. 2's name, as he died on 30/01/2023, with his legal representatives already added as parties. The court found the amendment clerical and consequential in nature, causing no prejudice to defendants, and permitted the plaintiff to file the amended plaint within stipulated time with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts