State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station vs Udayraj Jagdish Lodhi — 167/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO130002932026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
232/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
167/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
45
Police Station
Police Station Murgud
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Udayraj Jagdish Lodhi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.C./167/2026 Murgud Police Station v. Udayraj Jagdish Lodhi The court convicted Udayraj Jagdish Lodhi under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking his vehicle (Maruti Suzuki Super Carry) on a public road at Murgud Bajar, causing danger or obstruction on 06/03/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after the charges and consequences were explained to him. The court, taking a lenient view given the nature of the offense and the accused's cooperation, sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000, with one day simple imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 167/2026
Case Summary: S.C.C./167/2026 Murgud Police Station v. Udayraj Jagdish Lodhi The court convicted Udayraj Jagdish Lodhi under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for parking his vehicle (Maruti Suzuki Super Carry) on a public road at Murgud Bajar, causing danger or obstruction on 06/03/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after the charges and consequences were explained to him. The court, taking a lenient view given the nature of the offense and the accused's cooperation, sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000, with one day simple imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts