Gahininath Nagari Sahkari Patsanstha tarfe Manager Maruti Ganpati Shende vs Prakash Pandurang Kambale Advocate - P. T. Mali — 321/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO130002922018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
484/2018
Filing Date
11-09-2018
Registration No
321/2018
Registration Date
11-09-2018
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gahininath Nagari Sahkari Patsanstha tarfe Manager Maruti Ganpati Shende
Adv. D. C. pimpale
Respondent(s)
Prakash Pandurang Kambale Advocate - P. T. Mali
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-02-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 05-01-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 11-12-2025 | Dismissal Order | |
| 12-11-2025 | Dismissal Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kagal dismissed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for want of prosecution. The court found that the complainant had consistently remained absent and failed to proceed with the case for over 7 years despite multiple opportunities, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecution. The accused was accordingly acquitted under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kagal dismissed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for want of prosecution. The court found that the complainant had consistently remained absent and failed to proceed with the case for over 7 years despite multiple opportunities, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecution. The accused was accordingly acquitted under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts