Ananda Shankar Patil vs Hindurao Maruti Mhatugade Advocate - A. P. Paste — 52/2023
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34,37. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 07th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130002782023
e-Filing Number
02-03-2023
Filing Number
77/2023
Filing Date
08-Mar-2023
Registration No
52/2023
Registration Date
08-Mar-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ananda Shankar Patil
Adv. S S Kestikar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hindurao Maruti Mhatugade Advocate - A. P. Paste
-
2.Chaya Hindurao Mhatuagade
-
3.Saubai Hindurao Mhatugade
-
4.Pravin Hindurao Mhatugade
-
5.Pandurang Hindurao Mhatugade
-
6.Shivaji Bapu Patil
-
7.Prakash Sadashiv Kirolkar
-
8.Nandini Vasant Mhatugade
-
9.Mangal Shankar Basarwadkar
-
10.Vaishali Dattatray Mhatugade
-
11.Sadashiv Bapu Patil
-
12.Bajirao Dattatray Patil
-
13.Vaishali Balaso Mhatugade
Case History
-
07-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
23-Jan-2026
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
28-Nov-2025
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
15-Oct-2025
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
22-Aug-2025
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
09-Jul-2025
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
23-Apr-2025
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
14-Feb-2025
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
13-Dec-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
11-Oct-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
26-Jul-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
10-May-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
05-Mar-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
17-Jan-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
06-Nov-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
26-Sep-2023
List of Witness
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
06-Sep-2023
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 52/2023 Petitioner: Ananda Shankar Patil Respondents: Hindurao Maruti Mhatugade (Advocate A.P. Paste) and others (Defendants 1-13) Court: Civil Judge Junior Division, Kagal Date: 06/09/2023 Outcome Injunction Application Rejected. The court denied the plaintiff's request for temporary injunction (under Order 39, Rules 1-2 CPC) to restrain defendants from disturbing his possession of agricultural property Gat No. 3 in Savarde Budhruk, Kolhapur. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience favoring the plaintiff, and no irreparable loss that would result from refusing the injunction. Key Findings The court held that while the plaintiff produced a 2010 sale deed claiming ownership, the deed lacked specific boundaries for the disputed ten property portions. The plaintiff's earlier similar suit (R.C.S. No. 58/2007) had failed on identical grounds. The defendants, claiming tenancy rights converted to ownership under the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, presented conflicting evidence regarding property possession and boundaries, making it impossible to establish a clear prima facie case at the interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Sep-2023
Issues
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
01-Sep-2023
Order on Exh
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
21-Aug-2023
Order on Exh
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
04-Aug-2023
Order on Exh
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
21-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
07-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
16-Jun-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
07-Jun-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
07-Jun-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
05-Jun-2023
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
06-May-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
06-May-2023
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
03-May-2023
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
26-Apr-2023
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
29-Mar-2023
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.
-
09-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 52/2023
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 52/2023 Petitioner: Ananda Shankar Patil Respondents: Hindurao Maruti Mhatugade (Advocate A.P. Paste) and others (Defendants 1-13) Court: Civil Judge Junior Division, Kagal Date: 06/09/2023 Outcome Injunction Application Rejected. The court denied the plaintiff's request for temporary injunction (under Order 39, Rules 1-2 CPC) to restrain defendants from disturbing his possession of agricultural property Gat No. 3 in Savarde Budhruk, Kolhapur. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience favoring the plaintiff, and no irreparable loss that would result from refusing the injunction. Key Findings The court held that while the plaintiff produced a 2010 sale deed claiming ownership, the deed lacked specific boundaries for the disputed ten property portions. The plaintiff's earlier similar suit (R.C.S. No. 58/2007) had failed on identical grounds. The defendants, claiming tenancy rights converted to ownership under the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, presented conflicting evidence regarding property possession and boundaries, making it impossible to establish a clear prima facie case at the interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts