Raghunath Vinayak Mane vs Bhagirathi Vinayak Mane — 38/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Lok-Nyayalaya. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130002682026
Next Hearing
16th July 2026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
60/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
38/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raghunath Vinayak Mane
Adv. B. B. Magdum
Respondent(s)
Bhagirathi Vinayak Mane
Dilip Vinayak Mane
Rangrao Vinayak Mane(Legal Heir) 3.
Sushila Rangrao Mane 3.
Supriya Dhanaji Aadole 3.
Madhuri Chetan Mali
Suman Vasant Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Lok-Nyayalaya
Lok-Nyayalaya
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 13-04-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 14-03-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In R.C.S. No. 38/2026, the Civil Judge Junior Division, Kagal, rejected the plaintiff's request for ex-parte temporary injunction relief, finding no extraordinary circumstances warranted such relief without hearing the defendants. The court issued a show cause notice to defendants Bhagirathi Vinayak Mane, Dilip Vinayak Mane, and Rangrao Vinayak Mane, returnable on 14/03/2026, requiring them to respond as to why temporary injunction should not be granted as prayed. Exemplary pleadings and special bench, if applicable, were allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In R.C.S. No. 38/2026, the Civil Judge Junior Division, Kagal, rejected the plaintiff's request for ex-parte temporary injunction relief, finding no extraordinary circumstances warranted such relief without hearing the defendants. The court issued a show cause notice to defendants Bhagirathi Vinayak Mane, Dilip Vinayak Mane, and Rangrao Vinayak Mane, returnable on 14/03/2026, requiring them to respond as to why temporary injunction should not be granted as prayed. Exemplary pleadings and special bench, if applicable, were allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts