Mr Suraj Raosaheb Mukre etc.01 vs Babu Shamu Pantkare etc. — 26/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Steps Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO130001782024

e-Filing Number

29-01-2024

Filing Number

51/2024

Filing Date

31-Jan-2024

Registration No

26/2024

Registration Date

02-Feb-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mr Suraj Raosaheb Mukre etc.01

    Adv. Sagar R. Patil

  2. 2.Sunil Raosaheb Mukre

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Babu Shamu Pantkare etc.

  2. 2.Vinayak Shivaji Awle

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Steps

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  5. 15-Jan-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  7. 05-Nov-2025

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 26/2024 Defendant No. 2 applied for rejection of the plaintiff's plaint, contending it was undervalued and proper court fees were not paid. The court rejected this application, holding that since the plaintiff was not a party to the impugned Sale Deed dated 24/08/2021, he properly paid court fees under section 6iv(j) of the Bombay Court Fees Act (applicable to non-parties seeking declaration of avoidance), rather than section 6iv(ha) (for parties to the deed). The application was accordingly dismissed as devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 05-Nov-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  9. 06-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  10. 12-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  11. 05-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  12. 01-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  13. 22-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  14. 01-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  15. 07-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  16. 07-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  17. 13-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  18. 22-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  19. 11-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  20. 23-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  21. 23-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  22. 01-Aug-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  23. 04-Jul-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  24. 11-Jun-2024

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  25. 02-May-2024

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  26. 12-Apr-2024

    Summons_Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  27. 12-Mar-2024

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  28. 29-Feb-2024

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C.Kagal.

  29. 08-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 31-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 26/2024 Defendant No. 2 applied for rejection of the plaintiff's plaint, contending it was undervalued and proper court fees were not paid. The court rejected this application, holding that since the plaintiff was not a party to the impugned Sale Deed dated 24/08/2021, he properly paid court fees under section 6iv(j) of the Bombay Court Fees Act (applicable to non-parties seeking declaration of avoidance), rather than section 6iv(ha) (for parties to the deed). The application was accordingly dismissed as devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case