Mangesh Ramchandra Padalkar vs State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station — 17/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503,. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 13th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO130001252026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

98/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

12-02-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal

Judge

10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1

Police Station

Police Station Murgud

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503,

Petitioner(s)

Mangesh Ramchandra Padalkar

Adv. Deepak G. Patil

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

04-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court allowed Mangesh Ramchandra Padalkar's application for temporary release of his seized Samsung S24 mobile phone (worth Rs. 61,000) on the grounds that he established prima facie ownership through Aadhar and purchase receipt, is not the accused, and the investigating officer did not claim the device contains evidence relevant to the narcotic drugs case. The court released the phone temporarily until trial conclusion, subject to furnishing a Rs. 75,000 indemnity bond and conditions that he preserve the device, not alienate it, and produce it as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed Mangesh Ramchandra Padalkar's application for temporary release of his seized Samsung S24 mobile phone (worth Rs. 61,000) on the grounds that he established prima facie ownership through Aadhar and purchase receipt, is not the accused, and the investigating officer did not claim the device contains evidence relevant to the narcotic drugs case. The court released the phone temporarily until trial conclusion, subject to furnishing a Rs. 75,000 indemnity bond and conditions that he preserve the device, not alienate it, and produce it as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case