Mangesh Ramchandra Padalkar vs State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station — 17/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503,. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO130001252026
e-Filing Number
02-02-2026
Filing Number
98/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
17/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1
Police Station
Police Station Murgud
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mangesh Ramchandra Padalkar
Adv. Deepak G. Patil
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Th. Murgud Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 04-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court allowed Mangesh Ramchandra Padalkar's application for temporary release of his seized Samsung S24 mobile phone (worth Rs. 61,000) on the grounds that he established prima facie ownership through Aadhar and purchase receipt, is not the accused, and the investigating officer did not claim the device contains evidence relevant to the narcotic drugs case. The court released the phone temporarily until trial conclusion, subject to furnishing a Rs. 75,000 indemnity bond and conditions that he preserve the device, not alienate it, and produce it as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed Mangesh Ramchandra Padalkar's application for temporary release of his seized Samsung S24 mobile phone (worth Rs. 61,000) on the grounds that he established prima facie ownership through Aadhar and purchase receipt, is not the accused, and the investigating officer did not claim the device contains evidence relevant to the narcotic drugs case. The court released the phone temporarily until trial conclusion, subject to furnishing a Rs. 75,000 indemnity bond and conditions that he preserve the device, not alienate it, and produce it as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts