Gundu Bala Patil POA Thru Rangrao Gundu Patil vs Vitthal Tukaram Kamble Other — 17/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO130000702023

Hearing

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

Filing Number

20/2023

Filing Date

19-01-2023

Registration No

17/2023

Registration Date

19-01-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal

Judge

10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Gundu Bala Patil POA Thru Rangrao Gundu Patil

Adv. S. S. Kestikar

Respondent(s)

Vitthal Tukaram Kamble Other

Vasant Tukaram Kamble

Keshav Tukaram Kamble

Mangal Jaysing Kamble

Kapil Jaysing Kamble

Tanaji Balvant Kamble

Sidhu Bhau Kamble

Dayanand Balu Kamble

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kagal.-2

27-04-2026

Hearing

16-03-2026

Hearing

07-01-2026

Steps

29-10-2025

Steps

08-09-2025

Steps

Interim Orders

26-10-2023
Order on T.I.
18-06-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS No. 17/2023 The application filed by Gundu Bala Patil POA (through Rangrao Gundu Patil) against Vitthal Tukaram Kamble and others for possession and perpetual injunction was allowed. Although the plaintiff was reported dead with a death certificate filed on record, the court found that the right to sue survived given the nature of the suit and reliefs claimed. The plaintiff was directed to carry out the necessary amendment accordingly, as the application was filed within the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 17/2023 The application filed by Gundu Bala Patil POA (through Rangrao Gundu Patil) against Vitthal Tukaram Kamble and others for possession and perpetual injunction was allowed. Although the plaintiff was reported dead with a death certificate filed on record, the court found that the right to sue survived given the nature of the suit and reliefs claimed. The plaintiff was directed to carry out the necessary amendment accordingly, as the application was filed within the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case