Mumtajabi Nijam Nayakwadi vs Yashwant Dyanu patil Array[3]- S. S. Kestikar Array[3]- S. S. KestikarS. S. Kestikar, Array[3]- S. S. KestikarS. S. Kestikar,S. S. Kestikar, Array[3]- S. S. KestikarS. S. Kestikar,S. S. Kestikar,S. S. Kestikar, — 16/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130000702021
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
28/2021
Filing Date
28-01-2021
Registration No
16/2021
Registration Date
28-01-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mumtajabi Nijam Nayakwadi
Adv. K. D. Jadhav
Respondent(s)
Yashwant Dyanu patil Array[3]- S. S. Kestikar Array[3]- S. S. KestikarS. S. Kestikar, Array[3]- S. S. KestikarS. S. Kestikar,S. S. Kestikar, Array[3]- S. S. KestikarS. S. Kestikar,S. S. Kestikar,S. S. Kestikar,
Chief Officer
Mahadu Rama Teli(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: Mumtajabi Nayakwadi v. Yashwant Patil (16/2021) The petitioner sought to add the legal heirs of deceased Mahadu Rama Teli as necessary parties and make amendments to the suit regarding property rights. The respondent opposed, arguing the proposed parties were not necessary and the amendment was merely dilatory. The court granted the petitioner's application, finding that the legal heirs of Mahadu Rama Teli must be made parties since they hold rights in the disputed property and their inclusion would not prejudice the respondent's defense. The petitioner was directed to file the amended pleadings within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: Mumtajabi Nayakwadi v. Yashwant Patil (16/2021) The petitioner sought to add the legal heirs of deceased Mahadu Rama Teli as necessary parties and make amendments to the suit regarding property rights. The respondent opposed, arguing the proposed parties were not necessary and the amendment was merely dilatory. The court granted the petitioner's application, finding that the legal heirs of Mahadu Rama Teli must be made parties since they hold rights in the disputed property and their inclusion would not prejudice the respondent's defense. The petitioner was directed to file the amended pleadings within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts