Kishor Ramchandra Tawade vs Sandeep Ashok Kesarkar Advocate - A. J. Desai — 12/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130000552021
Next Hearing
20th July 2026
Filing Number
23/2021
Filing Date
22-01-2021
Registration No
12/2021
Registration Date
22-01-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kishor Ramchandra Tawade
Adv. S. S. Kestikar
Respondent(s)
Sandeep Ashok Kesarkar Advocate - A. J. Desai
Ashutosh Ashok Kesarkar
Suhas Ashok Kesarkar
Sunita Ashok Kesarkar
Ashok Vithal Kesarkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Steps |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps |
| 06-02-2026 | Steps |
| 11-12-2025 | Steps |
| 27-10-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Kishor Ramchandra Tawade v. Sandeep Ashok Kesarkar (R.C.S. 12/2021) Outcome: Interim injunction application GRANTED. The court ordered that defendants be temporarily restrained from obstructing or interfering with the plaintiff's possession of three agricultural properties in Kasaba Kagal until final disposal of the suit. The plaintiff, who purchased the properties via registered sale deeds (2007-2009), established prima facie possession and proved irreparable loss would result if the injunction was denied. The court rejected defendants' claims that possession was never transferred and that the deeds were merely security for loans. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Kishor Ramchandra Tawade v. Sandeep Ashok Kesarkar (R.C.S. 12/2021) Outcome: Interim injunction application GRANTED. The court ordered that defendants be temporarily restrained from obstructing or interfering with the plaintiff's possession of three agricultural properties in Kasaba Kagal until final disposal of the suit. The plaintiff, who purchased the properties via registered sale deeds (2007-2009), established prima facie possession and proved irreparable loss would result if the injunction was denied. The court rejected defendants' claims that possession was never transferred and that the deeds were merely security for loans. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts