Sandip Kondiba Mendake vs Dilip Sadashiv Tilave Advocate - S. M. Savardekar — 1700007/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitforInjucation. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130000322012
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
1700011/2012
Filing Date
09-01-2012
Registration No
1700007/2012
Registration Date
11-01-2012
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandip Kondiba Mendake
Adv. S. S. Kestikar
Respondent(s)
Dilip Sadashiv Tilave Advocate - S. M. Savardekar
Muktabai Kondiba Mendake(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 14-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Civil Suite No. 7/2012, the court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. The suit seeks perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's possession of the property. The court permitted the plaintiff to add material particulars regarding the theory of adoption and rejected the defendant's opposition, finding the amendment bona fide and not changing the nature of the claim. The plaintiff was allowed 14 days to file the amended plaint, subject to costs of Rs. 500. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Civil Suite No. 7/2012, the court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. The suit seeks perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's possession of the property. The court permitted the plaintiff to add material particulars regarding the theory of adoption and rejected the defendant's opposition, finding the amendment bona fide and not changing the nature of the claim. The plaintiff was allowed 14 days to file the amended plaint, subject to costs of Rs. 500. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts