Indian State Bank, Branch Bhudargad Gargoti Through Assistant Manager Rohit Mahendra Varude vs Amol Mulaji Patil Advocate - Adv. — 263/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO120006302024

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

19th May 2026

e-Filing Number

24-09-2024

Filing Number

477/2024

Filing Date

26-09-2024

Registration No

263/2024

Registration Date

26-09-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Indian State Bank, Branch Bhudargad Gargoti Through Assistant Manager Rohit Mahendra Varude

Adv. PATIL SHITALKUMAR DHANAPAL

Respondent(s)

Amol Mulaji Patil Advocate - Adv.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

10-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

05-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

07-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

23-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

18-07-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

10-12-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 9,00,000 dated 20/07/2024 drawn on State Bank of India, Bhudargad (Gargoti). The court found prima facie sufficient evidence that all statutory requirements under Section 138 were complied with, including the issuance of a timely demand notice and filing of the complaint within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 9,00,000 dated 20/07/2024 drawn on State Bank of India, Bhudargad (Gargoti). The court found prima facie sufficient evidence that all statutory requirements under Section 138 were complied with, including the issuance of a timely demand notice and filing of the complaint within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case