State of Maharashtra vs Yashwant Vishnu Gulambe Advocate - Sarjerav B. Patil — 72/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,324,323,504,506,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO120006302023
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
390/2023
Filing Date
18-10-2023
Registration No
72/2023
Registration Date
23-10-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
FIR Details
FIR Number
129
Police Station
Excise Department
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Sushant B. Kambale
Respondent(s)
Yashwant Vishnu Gulambe Advocate - Sarjerav B. Patil
Ramesh Vishnu Gulambe
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Abhijit Ramesh Gulambe
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 19-08-2025 | Evidence |
| 21-04-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 72/2023 Summary On 05/07/2024, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gargoti framed charges against three accused (Yashwant Vishnu Gulambe, Ramesh Vishnu Gulambe, and Abhijeet Ramesh Gulambe) for an incident on 13/05/2021 involving house trespass, grievous hurt by stone, simple hurt, abusive language, and criminal intimidation against informant Dattatraya Govind Genge. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried; the magistrate directed that they will be tried on the framed charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 72/2023 Summary On 05/07/2024, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gargoti framed charges against three accused (Yashwant Vishnu Gulambe, Ramesh Vishnu Gulambe, and Abhijeet Ramesh Gulambe) for an incident on 13/05/2021 involving house trespass, grievous hurt by stone, simple hurt, abusive language, and criminal intimidation against informant Dattatraya Govind Genge. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried; the magistrate directed that they will be tried on the framed charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts