Indian State Bank, Branch Bhudargad Gargoti Through Assistant Manager Rohit Mahendra Varude vs Geeta Sandeep Hasbe Advocate - Adv. — 262/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO120006152024
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
e-Filing Number
30-08-2024
Filing Number
469/2024
Filing Date
03-09-2024
Registration No
262/2024
Registration Date
04-09-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Indian State Bank, Branch Bhudargad Gargoti Through Assistant Manager Rohit Mahendra Varude
Adv. PATIL SHITALKUMAR DHANAPAL
Respondent(s)
Geeta Sandeep Hasbe Advocate - Adv.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 05-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 07-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 23-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 18-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: Process has been issued against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found prima facie sufficient evidence that the accused issued a cheque of Rs. 4,00,000 which was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and that the complainant complied with all statutory requirements including issuance of demand notice within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Process has been issued against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found prima facie sufficient evidence that the accused issued a cheque of Rs. 4,00,000 which was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and that the complainant complied with all statutory requirements including issuance of demand notice within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts