Babaso Anandrao Khot vs Sanjay Bapuso Patil Advocate - A. J. More — 1500014/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 30. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
Darkhast - Execution Petition
CNR: MHKO120005352012
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
150014/2012
Filing Date
31-12-2012
Registration No
1500014/2012
Registration Date
31-12-2012
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Babaso Anandrao Khot
Adv. S. D. Bhosale
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Bapuso Patil Advocate - A. J. More
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 21-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 04-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 24-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The petition filed by Babaso Anandrao Khot objecting to the inclusion of properties (Gate No. 163 and 240) in debt recovery proceedings was allowed. The court found that the objector, being a co-heir with legitimate share in the disputed properties, raised valid grounds that these properties should be excluded from attachment. The court ordered removal of the specified properties from the debt recovery proceedings, while directing the creditor's claim to be satisfied from the debtor's own separate assets instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The petition filed by Babaso Anandrao Khot objecting to the inclusion of properties (Gate No. 163 and 240) in debt recovery proceedings was allowed. The court found that the objector, being a co-heir with legitimate share in the disputed properties, raised valid grounds that these properties should be excluded from attachment. The court ordered removal of the specified properties from the debt recovery proceedings, while directing the creditor's claim to be satisfied from the debtor's own separate assets instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts