Sonali Akash Kamble vs Akash Tukaram Kamble Advocate - N. D. Desai — 20/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Awaiting Warrant. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHKO120005312022
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
Filing Number
302/2022
Filing Date
04-11-2022
Registration No
20/2022
Registration Date
04-11-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sonali Akash Kamble
Adv. V. D. Mhangore
Respondent(s)
Akash Tukaram Kamble Advocate - N. D. Desai
Tukaram Koyappa Kamble
shardha Tukaram Kamble
Smita Deepak Kamble
Raghunath Koyappa Kamble
Navsabai Raghunath Kamble
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 04-05-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 18-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 05-02-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 20/2022 Outcome: Both petitions (Petition 39 and 40) were allowed. A recovery warrant was issued against Respondent No. 1 (Akash Tukaram Kamble) for Rs. 63,000/- for non-payment of interim maintenance ordered in this case involving petitioner Sonali Akash Kamble. The court rejected the respondent's argument that a recovery petition must be filed separately under CrPC Section 128, holding that the court has authority to enforce interim maintenance orders and issue recovery warrants directly under relevant provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 20/2022 Outcome: Both petitions (Petition 39 and 40) were allowed. A recovery warrant was issued against Respondent No. 1 (Akash Tukaram Kamble) for Rs. 63,000/- for non-payment of interim maintenance ordered in this case involving petitioner Sonali Akash Kamble. The court rejected the respondent's argument that a recovery petition must be filed separately under CrPC Section 128, holding that the court has authority to enforce interim maintenance orders and issue recovery warrants directly under relevant provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts