Vitthal Vishnu Repe vs Thomas Fransis Pirera Advocate - A. M. Patravale — 124/2019
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,36,37,38. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO120005132019
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
201/2019
Filing Date
25-11-2019
Registration No
124/2019
Registration Date
04-12-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vitthal Vishnu Repe
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Dinkar Vishnu Repe
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Dattatray Daulu Repe
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Yashwant Aaba Repe
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Balvant Yashwant Repe
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Baban Yashwant Repe
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Ashok Dattu Repe
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Pandurang Dattu Repe
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Namdev Dundu Repe
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Pandurang Shamrao Tavade
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Satish Pandurang Tavade
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Maruti Pandurang Tawade
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Respondent(s)
Thomas Fransis Pirera Advocate - A. M. Patravale
Fransis Shalu Pirera(Legal Heir)
Kaitan Shalu Pirera
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
Issues
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Steps | |
| 10-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 03-02-2026 | Steps | |
| 15-01-2026 | Steps | |
| 24-11-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application with costs of Rs. 500 imposed on defendants 1, 3(A) to 3(D) for delay. The 'No Written Statement' order against defendants 1, 3(A), 3(C), 3(D) and the ex-parte order against defendant 3(B) were set aside, permitting defendants to file their written statements and present their case on merits in this suit for completion of sale deed and perpetual injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application with costs of Rs. 500 imposed on defendants 1, 3(A) to 3(D) for delay. The 'No Written Statement' order against defendants 1, 3(A), 3(C), 3(D) and the ex-parte order against defendant 3(B) were set aside, permitting defendants to file their written statements and present their case on merits in this suit for completion of sale deed and perpetual injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts