Dnyandev Jivaba Magdum vs Vilas Shripati Patil Advocate - V. K. Patil — 1500037/2012
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO120005082010
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
1500037/2012
Filing Date
18-01-2010
Registration No
1500037/2012
Registration Date
02-02-2010
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dnyandev Jivaba Magdum
Adv. G. T. Thakur
Respondent(s)
Vilas Shripati Patil Advocate - V. K. Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Reg. Civil Suit No. 37/2012 Outcome: The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint was allowed. The court permitted correction of a date from "06/09/2008" to "05/09/2008" in paragraph 3, line 16, and addition of one sentence. The plaintiff was directed to carry out the amendment within 14 days. The court found the amendment was due to genuine oversight, the plaintiff demonstrated due diligence, and no prejudice would result to the defendant, as the suit's nature remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Reg. Civil Suit No. 37/2012 Outcome: The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint was allowed. The court permitted correction of a date from "06/09/2008" to "05/09/2008" in paragraph 3, line 16, and addition of one sentence. The plaintiff was directed to carry out the amendment within 14 days. The court found the amendment was due to genuine oversight, the plaintiff demonstrated due diligence, and no prejudice would result to the defendant, as the suit's nature remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts