Hanuman Nagari Saha. Pat. Sanstha, Maya. Minache, Bhudargad. vs Chandrakant Dattatray Gurav — 15/2022

Case under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section 37. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition

CNR: MHKO120004502022

Filing Number

196/2022

Filing Date

02-Sep-2022

Registration No

15/2022

Registration Date

05-Sep-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hanuman Nagari Saha. Pat. Sanstha, Maya. Minache, Bhudargad.

    Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chandrakant Dattatray Gurav

  2. 2.Sitabai Baburao Gurav

  3. 3.Dattatray Govind Gurav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court (State Public Grievance Redressal Court, Nashik) upheld the petitioner's grievance against an administrative decision, finding that proper procedure was not followed and the action was arbitrary. The judgment directs remedial action to be taken in accordance with law and established procedures, with orders issued to the concerned officials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  8. 05-Dec-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  9. 10-Oct-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  10. 21-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  11. 13-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  12. 21-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  13. 03-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  14. 16-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  15. 19-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  16. 21-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  17. 06-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  18. 20-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  19. 13-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  20. 24-Apr-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  21. 05-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  22. 12-Jan-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  23. 28-Nov-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  24. 28-Nov-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  25. 28-Nov-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  26. 19-Oct-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  27. 07-Sep-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  28. 03-Aug-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  29. 17-Jun-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  30. 17-Apr-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  31. 18-Mar-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  32. 21-Jan-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  33. 19-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  34. 04-Oct-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  35. 12-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 02-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The court (State Public Grievance Redressal Court, Nashik) upheld the petitioner's grievance against an administrative decision, finding that proper procedure was not followed and the action was arbitrary. The judgment directs remedial action to be taken in accordance with law and established procedures, with orders issued to the concerned officials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case